Kind of odd, but get_one_sym() will be getting a different behavior.
Real life users *should* pick one or the other.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This is the more appropriate for a specific key (also considering the
num_layouts() is a bit of a made-up value).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Note first:
This commits breaks the ABI somewhat. If an application is run against
this commit without recompiling against the updated header, these break:
- xkb_state_layout_*_is_active always retuns false.
- xkb_state_serialize_mods always returns 0.
So it might break layout switching in some applications. However,
xkbcommon-compat.h provides the necessary fixes, so recompiling should
work (though updating the application is even better).
Split the enum to its individual components, which enables us to refer
to them individually. We will use that later for reporting which
components of the state have changed after update.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Currently xkb_keymap_num_leds() returns a count of valid (settable)
leds. Because the indexes might be non-consecutive, and some leds
might not be settable, it is incorrect to use this function for
iterating over the leds in the keymap. But this is the main use case of
this function, so instead of the current behavior we adapt the function
to the use case by making it return the needed range of iteration.
The caller needs to handle invalid intermittent indexes, though.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
xkb_keymap_num_leds() returns the number of leds that have any
possibility of being set. Even if a led is defined but can not be set in
any way, it is not counted.
In a few places currently we assume that led indexes are smaller than
this number, which is wrong both for the above reason and for the fact
that the xkb format actually allows explicitly setting the indicator
index, which means that the indexes might be non-consecutive.
We don't really have good API to iterate on leds, now, because
xkb_keymap_num_leds is pretty useless. To work around that we use
sizeof(xkb_led_mask_t) * 8.
This makes the "Group 2" led work (try switching to a layout other than
the first in test/interactive).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
- Add context.h and move context-related functions from xkb-priv.h to
it.
- Move xkb_context definition back to context.c.
- Add keysym.h and move keysym upper/lower/keypad from xkb-priv.h to it.
- Rename xkb-priv.h to map.h since it only contains keymap-related
definitions and declarations now.
- Remove unnecessary includes and some and some other small cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Currently the user has no way of knowing which of the active modifiers
have been used in the translation of a keycode to its keysyms. The use
case is described in the GTK docs: say there's a menu accelerator
activated by "<Alt>+". Some layouts have "+" shifted, and some have it
on the first level. So in keymaps where "+" is shifted, the Shift
modifier is consumed and must be ignored when the user is testing
for "<Alt>+". Otherwise, we may get "<Alt><Shift>+" and the accelerator
should not actually fire.
For this we also use the preserve[] information in the key types, which
can forces us to report modifiers as unconsumed even if they were used
in the translation. Until now we didn't do anything with this
information.
The API tries to match its surronding. It's not very efficient but this
can be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The program reads key events from evdev input devices, puts them through
the library and prints some information about them. It's nice for
experimenting, quick testing and trying to break it with random stuff
(already found some!).
It is called "interactive" for lack of a better name. It's a bit
hackish, but can easily be extended, made more portable etc, in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Conflicts:
Makefile.am
test/.gitignore
Ran Benita
Daniel Stone