Add a test/dump.data file which contains the result we're expecting from
xkb_map_get_as_string run on a particularly complex set of keymaps, and
assert that the string representations are the same. This means that
any updates to xkb_map_get_as_string will also need to update the test
data, but should also ensure that we don't have any more parser
regressions.
Compared with diff to the output of setxkbmap + xkbcomp for the same
keymap; seems completely solid.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
A symbols file may contain a global, non key specific setting for
the group out-of-range handling method (wrap, clamp, redirect). Only
that:
* Its parsed and kept in the SymbolsInfo, but is not otherwise used in
any way (it's the same in the real xkbcomp).
* It's not used in any of xkeyboard-config files.
* It's not mentioned in the xkb specs (only the per-key ones).
* It doesn't make much sense anyway.
So remove the struct field, and emit an "unsupported, ignored" warning.
We don't increment the error count because of it, just continue (the
radio group warning just below is changed to do the same - there's no
reason to possibly abort the entire thing for it).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Conflicts:
src/xkbcomp/symbols.c
Instead of using NoSymbol in the map, we use num_syms == 0 to signify
the non-presence of a symbol. So instead of adding NoSymbol mappings
to the list regardless, detect them and set num_syms == 0.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
The failure mode here is a little irritating:
- server loads map with ISO_Lock action
- server dumps keymap to string, including:
interpret ISO_Lock+AnyOfOrAll(None) {
action= NoAction();
};
as we don't (yet) print ISO_Lock actions
- client parses keymap from string
- client dumps keymap to string, including:
interpret ISO_Lock+AnyOfOrAll(None) {
};
- this results in a syntax error
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Some actions could also take relative rather than absolute parameters,
so they really needed to be signed instead of explicitly unsigned.
Oops.
Fixes, e.g., action= MovePtr(x=-1,y=+1), which was reported as
(x=+65535,y=+1).
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Add a non-extensive test to check that some basic things (e.g. rule
matching, var substitution, indexes and groups) work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Currently, if you pass in an rmlvo with an empty string for layout or
variant, it would not match layout and variant rules even with
wildcards. But if the rules file had set an appropriate default, and someone
passes in the empty string, than he should get the default.
NULL in this case signifies not wanting to match against the layout or
variant at all, and so the rule should still fail to match NULLs.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Daniel Stone
Ran Benita