We should handle empty xkb_keycode and xkb_symbol sections, since
xkbcomp handles them, and apparently XQuartz uses it. There are also
files for it in xkeyboard-config (rules=base model=empty layout=empty,
which translate to keycodes/empty and symbols/empty).
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67654
Reported-By: Gatis Paeglis <gatis.paeglis@digia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This is a proof-of-concept for the long key names. The keycodes in the
file evdev-xkbcommon are autogenerated from linux/input.h, and uses the
names given there; all of the previous names are aliased to the new
names, so they continue to work with the symbols files, etc.
You can try it with 'sudo ./test/interactive -r evdev-xkbcommon -n 0'
The -n 0 means that we don't offset the evdev scan codes - just feed
them directly. The -r evdev-xkbcommon just means to use a new rules file
which makes us use the new keycodes file. (The only problem I can see is
with the MENU and LSGT names which has some conflicts).
Maybe some day xkeyboard-config could ship something similar, so that
the 8 offset is unneeded.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Since we now handle empty model/layout, the last couple of tests should
not fail. The reason they do is bacause they try to use a non-existent
"base" rules file. When the file is brought in these tests do not fail.
Since we already test for non-existent rules file, we can remove them,
and refine the other tests a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Use a self-contained dataset instead of relying on a globally-installed
set. Data taken from xkeyboard-config 2.5.1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Pierre Le Marre
Ran Benita
Ran Benita
Daniel Stone