There are two ways to separate multiple files in XKB include statements:
'+' will cause the later file to override the first in case of conflict,
while '|' will cause it augment it (this is done by xkbcomp). '!' is
unrelated here.
Since '|' is practically never used, this wasn't noticed.
In the modified test, the '|some_compat' previously was just ignored.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Avoids a warning, from xkeyboard-config:
commit 6676053f2c93596c2aaa9905151a5c76355a1540
Author: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Fri Jun 29 09:53:45 2012 +1000
symbols: keypad can only have one default section
Warning: Multiple default components in keypad
Using x11, ignoring pointerkeys
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Group compatibility statements are like the following:
group 3 = AltGr;
This currently results in:
keymap->groups[2].mask = <real mod mapped from AltGr vmod>
And we don't do any thing with this value later. The reason it exists in
XKB is to support non-XKB clients (i.e. XKB support disabled entirely in
the server), which do not know the concept of "group", and use some
modifier to distinguish between the first and second keyboard layouts
(usually with the AltGr key). We don't care about all of that, so we can
forget about it.
One artifact of this removal is that xkb_map_num_groups no longer
works, because it counted through keymap->groups (this wasn't entirely
correct BTW). Instead we add a new num_groups member to the keymap,
which just hold the maximum among the xkb_key's num_groups. This also
means we don't have to compute anything just to get the number of
groups.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This field is used in conjunction with key behaviors, which we don't
support since c1ea23da5. This is also unused in xkeyboard-config.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Since we now handle empty model/layout, the last couple of tests should
not fail. The reason they do is bacause they try to use a non-existent
"base" rules file. When the file is brought in these tests do not fail.
Since we already test for non-existent rules file, we can remove them,
and refine the other tests a bit.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Recreate the old test/dump scenario, where we test the following map:
- rules: evdev
- model: pc104
- layout #1: us
- layout #2: ru
- layout #3: ca(multix)
- layout #4: de(neo)
This is ever so slightly altered from the xkbcomp output; running the
following:
setxkbmap -rules evdev -model pc105 -layout us,ru,ca,de -variant
,,multix,neo -print | xkbcomp -xkb - -
will give you a map with RCTL added to the modifier_map for both Control
and Mod3. Running the output through xkbcomp -xkb - - again, will give
you RCTL only added to Mod3.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
As a map will implicitly go to level one unless explicitly mentioned
otherwise, remove all explicit =Level1 mappings, except for those with
preserve entries.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Bring the input file into line with recent changes to the dump output,
so we're as close as we can get to a round trip.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
If there is no map entry for some modifier combination, the default is
to use level 1. The removed code is an optimization to save some space
by removing these entries. But it doesn't actually save any space, and
did not in fact remove all level 1 entries (it walks the array while
modifying it so there's an off-by-one error).
We can instead keep them in the types but just not print them in
keymap-dump.c, to get about the same behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Xkb required every keymap to have at least the four following canonical
types: ONE_LEVEL, TWO_LEVEL, ALPHABETIC, KEYPAD. This is specified in
e.g. the kbproto spec and XkbKeyTypesForCoreSymbols(3) man page.
If these types are not specified in the keymap, the code specifically
checks for them and adds them to the 4 first places in the types array,
such that they exist in every keymap. These are also the types (along
with some non-required 4-level ones) that are automatically assigned to
keys which do not explicitly declare a type (see FindAutomaticType in
symbols.c, this commit doesn't touch these heuristics, whcih are also not
very nice but necessary).
The xkeyboard-config does not rely on the builtin xkbcomp definitions of
these types and does specify them explicitly, in types/basic and
types/numpad, which are virtually always included.
This commit removes the special behavior:
- The code is ugly and makes keytypes.c harder to read.
- The code practically never gets run - everyone who uses
xkeyboard-config or a keymap based upon it (i.e. everyone) doesn't need
it. So it doesn't get tested.
- It mixes policy with implementation for not very good reasons, it
seems mostly for default compatibility with X11 core.
- And of course we don't need to remain compatible with Xkb ABI neither.
Instead, if we read a keymap with no types specified at all, we simply
assign all keys a default one-level type (like ONE_LEVEL), and issue
plenty of warnings to make it clear (with verbosity >= 3). Note that
this default can actually be changed from within the keymap, by writing
something like
type.modifier = Shift
type.whatever_field = value
in the top level of the xkb_types section. (This functionality is
completely unused as well today, BTW, but makes some sense).
This change means that if someone writes a keymap from scratch and
doesn't add say ALPHABETIC, then something like <AE11> = { [ q Q ]; }; will
ignore the second level. But as stated above this should never happen.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Readd the component names to the keymap->names struct. This is used when
printing the component, e.g.
xkb_keymap {
xkb_keycodes "evdev+aliases(qwerty)" {
instead of
xkb_keymap {
xkb_keycodes {
This makes diffing against xkbcomp $DISPLAY a bit easier and is kind of
useful anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The code used to match a keysym to a keycode (see added comment)
differed in behavior from xkbcomp, always taking the first key it found.
This caused some incorrect interpretation of the xkeyboard-config data,
for example the one corrected in dump.data (see the diff): since the
de-neo layout sets the both_capslock option, the Left Shift key (LFSH)
has the Caps_Lock keysym in group 4 level 2; now since
keycode(Left Shift) = 50 < keycode(Caps Lock) = 64
the Left Shift one was picked, instead of the Caps Lock one which is
group 1 level 1. The correct behavior is to pick according to group,
level, keycode.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Use a self-contained dataset instead of relying on a globally-installed
set. Data taken from xkeyboard-config 2.5.1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
This was broken by commit 18d331b86b
(where only the first option out of a comma-separated string was
matched). Do it correctly this time and add a test.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Add a non-extensive test to check that some basic things (e.g. rule
matching, var substitution, indexes and groups) work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Rewrite all of the current tests in the following ways:
- Instead of the current mix of C and shell, just use single-process
pure C file per test. All of the .sh files are removed, but everything
that was tested is ported.
- Instead of handling the test logs ourselves, use Automake's
"parallel-test" mechanism. This will create a single log file for each
test with it's stdout+stderr, and a top level "test-suite.log" file
for all the failed tests.
- The "parallel-tests" directive also makes the test run in parallel,
so "make check" runs faster.
- Also use the "color-tests" directive to have the "make check" output
colorized. Who doesn't like to see PASS in green?
- All of the test data files are moved into the test/data subdirectory.
That way we can just put the directory in EXTRA_DIST and forget about
it.
- The test/Makefile.am file is consolidated into the main Makefile.am,
for a completely non-recursive build.
Right now the tests are completely independent and just use simple
assert()'s. More sophistication can be added as needed.
It should also be noted that it's still possible to use shell, python,
etc. if a test wants more flexibility than C can provide, just do as
before.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
[daniels: Updated for xkb_keymap changes.]
Ran Benita
Daniel Stone