interactive-wayland is very similar to x11/xev, and dumps out as much
state as possible.
It provides no titlebar and a completely random cursor, but such is
life.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
xkb_keymap_key_by_name() allows finding a keycode from a given keyname and
is useful for generating keyboard events to use in regression tests
during CI
xkb_keymap_key_get_name() is the inverse of xkb_keymap_key_by_name()
Signed-off-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@osg.samsung.com>
[ran: some stylistic tweaks + another test case]
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Some results from the benchmark (compilation of en_US.UTF-8/Compose):
$ grep 'model name' /proc/cpuinfo
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
$ uname -a
Linux ran 3.16.1-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Thu Aug 14 07:40:19 CEST 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ ./test/compose bench
compiled 1000 compose tables in 7.776488331s
So according to the above benchmark and valgrind --tool=massif, an
xkb_compose_table adds an overhead of about ~8ms time and ~130KB
resident memory.
For contrast, a plain US keymap adds an overhead of ~3ms time and 90KB
resident memory.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
It is like test/stringcomp, only instead of using
xkb_keymap_new_from_string(), it uses xkbcomp to upload the keymap to a
dummy Xvfb X server and then xkb_x11_keymap_new_from_device().
If any of these components are not present or fails, the test is shown
as skipped.
The test is messy, fragile, limited and depends on external tools, but I
will improve on that later -- it's better to have a test.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
We need to validate some UTF-8, so this adds an is_valid_utf8()
function, which is probably pretty slow but should work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Add two tests:
./test/interactive-x11
which is like test/interactive-evdev, but should behave exactly like your
X keyboard and react to state and keymap changes - in other words, just
like typing in xterm. Press ESC to exit.
./test/x11
which currently should only print out the same keymap as
xkbcomp $DISPLAY out.xkb
(modulo some whitespace and some constructs we do not support.)
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The current API doesn't allow the caller to create keymaps from mmap()'ed
files. The problem is, xkb_keymap_new_from_string() requires a terminating
0 byte. However, there is no way to guarantee that when using mmap() so a
user currently has to copy the whole file just to get the terminating zero
byte (assuming they cannot use xkb_keymap_new_from_file()).
This adds a new entry xkb_keymap_new_from_buffer() which takes a memory
location and the buffer size in bytes.
Internally, we depend on yy_scan_{string,byte}() helpers. According to
flex documentation these already copy the input string because they are
wrappers around yy_scan_buffer().
yy_scan_buffer() on the other hand has some insane requirements. The
buffer must be writeable and the last two bytes must be ASCII-NUL. But the
buffer may contain other 0 bytes just fine.
Because we don't want these constraints in our public API,
xkb_keymap_new_from_buffer() needs to create a copy of the input memory.
But it then calls yy_scan_buffer() directly. Hence, we have the same
number of buffer-copies as with *_from_string() but without the
terminating 0 requirement.
The explicit yy_scan_buffer() call is preferred over yy_scan_byte() so the
buffer-copy operation is not hidden somewhere in flex.
Maybe some day we no longer depend on flex and can have a zero-copy API. A
user could mmap() a file and it would get parsed right from this buffer.
But until then, we shouldn't expose this limitation in the API but instead
provide an API that some day can work with zero-copy.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
[ran: rebased on top of my branch]
Conflicts:
Makefile.am
src/xkbcomp/xkbcomp.c
This runs a bunch of random keys against xkb_state_update_key() and
xkb_state_key_get_one_sym(), in a fairly unintelligent way.
It might be nice to check when modifying this code path, or changing it,
to see things haven't slowed down considerably. However, given the
numbers this benchmark gives, it is pretty clear that we are not going
to be the bottleneck for anything. So this can more-or-less be ignored.
Incidentally, this also turned out to be a poor man's fuzzer, because it
turned up the fix in the previous commit. Maybe we should consider
beefing it up with an actual 'break stuff' intention and running it as
part of 'make check'.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This just prints the compiled keymap string for to the given command
line arguments. This often useful when developing.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The program reads key events from evdev input devices, puts them through
the library and prints some information about them. It's nice for
experimenting, quick testing and trying to break it with random stuff
(already found some!).
It is called "interactive" for lack of a better name. It's a bit
hackish, but can easily be extended, made more portable etc, in the
future.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Conflicts:
Makefile.am
test/.gitignore
This test verifies the core purpose of this library, which is to
translate the user's keypresses into keysyms according to the keymap and
the XKB specification.
The tests emulate a series of key presses, and checks that the resulting
keysyms are what we expect.
Several of the tests currently fail, and plenty more should be added and
maybe split up.
It also currently uses an RMLVO keymap, which comes from the
xkeyboard-config data set, and whose behaviour may change in the future.
So it should probably be changed to use several files of our own, but
it's OK for now.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Add a non-extensive test to check that some basic things (e.g. rule
matching, var substitution, indexes and groups) work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Added a test program, rulescomp, which takes a RMLVO set and generates a
XkbcDescPtr. This is essentially what the xserver will do, except that we
still need to access some xkbcomp internal API to make it work.
A test program and script have been added for checking the XkbCommon
keysym functions. This has already highlighted an error in handling of
keysyms from XF86keysym.h.
Daniel Stone
Mike Blumenkrantz
Ran Benita
David Herrmann
Daniel Stone
Gaetan Nadon
Dan Nicholson