From 196f69984a598f48b48ae6de5d4f1c56ff783086 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sam Lantinga <slouken@libsdl.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 22:03:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed NEON detection on arm64 CPUs This probably breaks
 RISCOS, but we need a better fix from Cameron Cawley for this

---
 src/cpuinfo/SDL_cpuinfo.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/cpuinfo/SDL_cpuinfo.c b/src/cpuinfo/SDL_cpuinfo.c
index faf4e60ea..77e0ac59d 100644
--- a/src/cpuinfo/SDL_cpuinfo.c
+++ b/src/cpuinfo/SDL_cpuinfo.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ CPU_haveAltiVec(void)
     return altivec;
 }
 
-#if !defined(__arm__)
+#if !defined(__ARM_ARCH)
 static int
 CPU_haveARMSIMD(void)
 {
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ CPU_haveNEON(void)
 #  endif
 /* All WinRT ARM devices are required to support NEON, but just in case. */
     return IsProcessorFeaturePresent(PF_ARM_NEON_INSTRUCTIONS_AVAILABLE) != 0;
-#elif !defined(__arm__)
+#elif !defined(__ARM_ARCH)
     return 0;  /* not an ARM CPU at all. */
 #elif __ARM_ARCH >= 8
     return 1;  /* ARMv8 always has non-optional NEON support. */