geemili
/
drm
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Changes to DRM(irq_install)...... wrap dev->dma usage with __HAVE_DMA in 

irq handler, fixes kernel ooops. comment out some setting of flags that
    are done in DRM(setup) (not sure why both of the above is done in the
    irq handler)
main
Alan Hourihane 2003-11-05 20:47:28 +00:00
parent 66c9e3053f
commit a41a479f74
2 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
linux-core/drm_irq.c
View File

@ -122,13 +122,17 @@ int DRM(irq_install)( drm_device_t *dev )
DRM_DEBUG( "%s: irq=%d\n", __FUNCTION__, dev->irq );
#if 0 /* this is already done in DRM(setup) - why do it here ?? */
dev->context_flag = 0;
dev->interrupt_flag = 0;
dev->dma_flag = 0;
#endif
#if __HAVE_DMA
dev->dma->next_buffer = NULL;
dev->dma->next_queue = NULL;
dev->dma->this_buffer = NULL;
#endif
#if __HAVE_IRQ_BH
#if !HAS_WORKQUEUE

4
linux/drm_irq.h
View File

@ -122,13 +122,17 @@ int DRM(irq_install)( drm_device_t *dev )
DRM_DEBUG( "%s: irq=%d\n", __FUNCTION__, dev->irq );
#if 0 /* this is already done in DRM(setup) - why do it here ?? */
dev->context_flag = 0;
dev->interrupt_flag = 0;
dev->dma_flag = 0;
#endif
#if __HAVE_DMA
dev->dma->next_buffer = NULL;
dev->dma->next_queue = NULL;
dev->dma->this_buffer = NULL;
#endif
#if __HAVE_IRQ_BH
#if !HAS_WORKQUEUE