This old rules parser gives the same kccgst here, so in the interest of
staying compatible we shouldn't fix it there. Similarly we shouldn't
touch ParseIncludeMap, so this is the best place to handle this.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Rename the functions to get keysyms by key/layout/level to fit with the
recent public API renames, and expose them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Move xkb_map_* functions to xkb_keymap_*, xkb_key_* functions under
either xkb_keymap or xkb_state, and rename groups to layout in all
user-visible API.
Backwards-compatible hooks are provided, such that old source will
build, but silently mangled to the new names, and old binaries will
also continue to work.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
This just prints the compiled keymap string for to the given command
line arguments. This often useful when developing.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
xkblib spec says:
XkbSA_LockNoLock If set, and the action type is XkbSA_LockMods,
the server only unlocks the action modifiers.
XkbSA_LockNoUnlock If set, and the action is XkbSA_LockMods,
the server only locks the action modifiers.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The xkblib spec says:
If XkbSA_UseModMapMods is not set in the flags field, the mask,
real_mods, vmods1, and vmods2 fields are used to determine the
action modifiers. Otherwise they are ignored and the modifiers
bound to the key (client map->modmap[keycode]) are used instead.
So we should just assign the modmap without considering what's there.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This change adds range checks based on the lowest keysym and highest keysym in
the table. This allows a quick check to be applied to identify if the keysym
is inside the table.
To really give value to this optimisation the table is split to have a
separate table for the keypad keysyms.
The test suite passes with this change.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <rob@linux.intel.com>
Trying ''./test/interactive -l us:5' causes us to crash.
The <layout>:<N> syntax says to put this layout at the N'th level.
However the code (inherited from xkbcomp) doesn't check that the group
is valid, and then happily indexes keyi->groups with it, which has a
static size of XKB_NUM_GROUPS (the SetExplicitGroup function assumes the
index is valid). So any value a user might put there > 4 makes nice
things happen.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
e.g. hhhhhHHHHHHHhhhhhh with shift down and up in the middle.
Unfortunately trying a quick test with test/interactive is not possible
because the evdev soft-repeat stops the repeat when another key is
pressed. So you need real soft-repeat for that.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
- Add context.h and move context-related functions from xkb-priv.h to
it.
- Move xkb_context definition back to context.c.
- Add keysym.h and move keysym upper/lower/keypad from xkb-priv.h to it.
- Rename xkb-priv.h to map.h since it only contains keymap-related
definitions and declarations now.
- Remove unnecessary includes and some and some other small cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
These statements are pretty pointless for us; we don't restrict keycodes
like X does, and if someone writes e.g. maximum = 255 but only has 100
keys, we currently happily alloc all those empty keys. xkbcomp already
handles the case when these statements aren't given, and uses a computed
min/max instead. We should just always use that.
(Of course since keycodes/evdev currently uses almost all of the
keycodes in the range it declares, including 255, this doesn't save any
memory for the common user right now).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This removes all of the boilerplate from the *_new functions, and leaves
them just as simple functions which perform the effect of the action on state.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Pass the new filter as a parameter instead of getting a new one in each
action function, and introducing a failure condition there.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
The policy is now consistent: every API functions which recieves a
keycode should resolve it to an xkb_key first thing, and all the
internal functions use that instead of the keycode.
To facilitate it a bit, we move the KeycodeInRange check to XkbKey
itself, which returns NULL if the keycode is illegal.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
- The Clear* functions should just free the memory associated with the
object. If the object is used again, it is Init'd again.
- s/Free/Clear if the actual pointer is not free'd.
- Zeroise object in Init and only initialize non-zero fields.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This layout stretches us pretty well, so it's good for testing nothing
breaks. There are a couple of things that need looking into, though
(particularly the level5 issue).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This regression was introduced in 93ce9c7d4f. This meant that actions
specified inside key {} statments were always going to the first group.
But actions are almost never specified in xkb_symbols so this wasn't
noticed.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Background:
The CopySymbolsDef has a comment on a couple of lines which supposedly
fixed a bug:
/*
* kt_index[i] may have been set by a previous run (if we have two
* layouts specified). Let's not overwrite it with the ONE_LEVEL
* default group if we dont even have keys for this group anyway.
*
* FIXME: There should be a better fix for this.
*/
if (!darray_empty(groupi->levels))
key->kt_index[i] = types[i];
But neither the comment nor the fix make any sense, because the kt_index
is indexed per group, i.e. each group gets its own type.
The original xkbcomp commit which added this (36fecff58) points to this
bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436626
which complains about -layout "ru,us" -variant "phonetic," not working
properly. And indeed when we try:
sudo ./test/interactive -l ru,us -v
the first group doesn't get any syms for the main keys.
The problem (Clearly the fix above is useless):
The ru(phonetic) map is specified using aliases, e.g. LatQ, LatW instead
of AD01, AD02, etc. When combined with another layout which uses the
real names (AD01, AD02), the symbols code should recognize they are the
same key and merge them into one KeyInfo. The current code does that,
but it doesn't catch the case where the alias was processes *before* the
real one; so we get two KeyInfo's and the later one wins. So e.g. the
ru(phonetic) symbols are ignored.
The fix:
Before adding a new KeyInfo to the keys array, always replace its name
by the real name, which avoids the entire issue. Luckily this is done
pretty late so most error messages should still show the alias name.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Since now we only use the keycode in this function for logging, it's
better not to mention the keycode at all because the XkbKeyGetKeycode
macro is implemented using a dirty hack 0_0
The key name is sufficient to determine uniquely where to look.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
This function does some funky stuff, which, as far as I can tell, was
needed to support the functionality of giving different keycodes the
same name and thus make them duplicates (MERGE_ALT_FORM). This stuff was
removed as useless in 0765064b3, but this leftover wasn't noticed.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Add a LevelInfo to hold a single array of level specific info inside
a GroupInfo, instead of keeping the acts, symsMapIndex and
symsMapNumEntries arrays and the numLevels field separate and in sync.
This simplifies the code, and goes a long way toward making the
key-merging code somewhat understandable. Also uses less memory.
Note that the syms array is still in GroupInfo for now, with the levels
holding offsets into it.
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
GroupInfo keeps all of the info for a specific group in one struct.
This is the old array-of-structures vs. structure-of-arrays, but in this
case readability wins. It would also help with lifting the
XkbNumKbdGroups limit, because we only have to worry about one array
(instead of 6).
Signed-off-by: Ran Benita <ran234@gmail.com>
Ran Benita
Daniel Stone
Rob Bradford