Hi Alex,
Enclosed is a revised version of the patch sent on Mar 18, against
the master branch of the drm userspace (i.e. libdrm). Details
summarised in this thread:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2011-March/009499.html
This patch reconciles libdrm with the the kernel change that Dave
pushed this morning. It *supersedes* the previously sent patch (i.e.
apply it to the master branch as it exists at the time of this writing,
not as an incremental patch to the one sent previously).
Regards,
Ilija
Signed-off-by: Ilija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
This is Fail.
First patch to libdrm, and I've borked it up.
Noticed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
... and if asked to open a bo by the same global name, return a fresh
reference to the previously allocated buffer.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The nvc0 gallium drivers passes NULL here to indicate to the memory manager
that a buffer is being used, but without creating an actual reloc.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
gen4+ hardware doesn't use fences for GPU access and the older kernel
doesn't expect userspace to make such a mistake. So don't.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32190
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
For relaxed fencing the object may only consume the small set of active
pages, but still requires a fence region once bound into the aperture.
This is the size we need to use when computing the maximum possible
aperture space that could be used by a single batchbuffer and so avoid
hitting ENOSPC.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
It makes sure that GPU object destruction is executed in order with
respect to the previous FIFO commands.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Both the consumers of this API (sync objects and client throttling)
were expecting this behavior. The kernel used to actually behave the
desired (but incorrect) way for us anyway, but that got fixed a while
back.
If bufmgr.bo_mrb_exec is not set, drm_intel_bo_mrb_exec returns ENODEV
even though drm_intel_gem_bo_mrb_exec2 will work fine for the RENDER ring.
Fixes xf86-video-intel after commit 'add BLT ring support' (5bed685f76)
with kernels without BSD or BLT ring support (2.6.34 and before).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31443
Signed-off-by: Albert Damen <albrt@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
The intent of these was to catch mismatched map/unmap. What it
actually did was check whether there was ever a mapping of that type
(including in a previous life of the buffer through the userland BO
cache), not whether they were mismatched. We don't even actually want
to catch mismatched map/unmap, unless we also do refcounting, since at
one point Mesa would do map/map/use/unmap/unmap. Just remove this
code instead.
nouveau_bo_unmap called the CPU_FINI IOCTL even if it was a NOSYNC
mapping. It caused no harmful effects (actually CPU_FINI is a no-op on
recent enough kernels) besides the precious CPU cycles being wasted.
Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Chih-Wei Huang
Chris Wilson
Ilija Hadzic
Dave Airlie
Daniel Vetter
Javier Jardón
Ben Skeggs
Kristian Høgsberg
Matt Turner
Benjamin Franzke
nobled
Marek Olšák
Francisco Jerez
Eric Anholt
Albert Damen