We're about to remove the -Wno flag from configure.ac which will lead
to a lot of unnecessary spam.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
v2: keep the bo_gem declaration in exec2() within the loop (Chris)
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Some compilers (like the Oracle Studio), require that the function
declaration must be annotated with the same visibility attribute as the
definition. As annotating functions with drm_public is no longer
required just remove the macro.
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
No exports changed for this driver.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These functions all take a format string and either a list of variable
arguments or a va_list. Use the new DRM_PRINTFLIKE macro to tell the
compiler about it so that the arguments can be checked against the
format string.
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
It accidentally used the cmd id for the gen7 command and had an
outdated lenght field. Spotted while trying to make sense of an ivb
error_state from mesa 7.11 ...
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Gen6, bit 15 is now `Depth Clear Value Valid`. This was being treated
as part of the length, and failing the rest of the batchbuffer decode.
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <chrisf@ijw.co.nz>
I mistakenly "fixed" a bad decode with
commit 7d0a1d5ebb
Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Date: Sun Jun 24 20:35:57 2012 -0700
intel/decode: VERTEX_ELEMENT_STATE, 1 means valid
However the actual fix is just to update the reference file, and
include GEN7 in the decode.
Props to Eric Anholt for putting the test in distcheck, or else I
wouldn't have caught this.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
... and add support to decode MI instructions with functions.
Reviewed-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Note that the regression test complains here: The batch that was
captured included a bug in its packet output, which was later fixed in
Mesa.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This requires pulling the gen6 3DSTATE_WM out to a function so it
doesn't override gen7's handler.
v2: Fix pasteo in interpreting ZW interpolation (thanks danvet!).
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This just gets packet name and length in place, with the remainder
unfinished. I've long since finished the work that got me started
fixing up the decode.
Since CC_STATE_POINTERS for gen6 and 7 are quite different but use the
same opcode, move gen6 out to a helper function too, so we can use a
helper function for gen7.
This puts the error message in a consistent location relative to the
packet, and while I'm here I made the error message a bit more
informative.
Now, most static length packets need to just declare their length in
the table and not worry.
The overflow checks were all thoroughly untested, and a bunch of the
ones I'm deleting were pretty broken. Now, in the case of overflow,
you just decode data of 0xd0d0d0d0, and instr_out prints the warning
message instead. Note that this still has the same issue of being
under-tested, but at least it's one place instead of per-packet.
A couple of BUFFER_FAIL uses are left where the length to be decoded
could be (significantly) larger than a page, and the decode didn't
just call instr_out (which doesn't dereference data itself unless it's
safe).
Consumers often want to choose stdout vs stderr, and for testing I
want to output to an open_memstream file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
It was producing an unused code warning. I'm tempted to just remove
it, since it's unused, but I *might* use it soon.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
I'd rather be able to use c99 variable declarations (there's a lot of
awful code layout due to being c90ish), but I'll leave that for later.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
There was plenty of dropped useful data, and some horribly
mis-formatted data.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>
We've got a different (better) set of warning flags in place in this
tree.
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@dodonov.net>